|
UI is good, I would suggest you list models by Nationality instead of city.
Generally, no one (audience) cares who directed the movie or photoset. Sure, people know brand names now and have their niche, but no one cares that is been shot by John Doe. I think you have clone this from AFSC, but you average Joe just to see what they are into ASAP be a hot girl which in this day is more a specific model or performer.
The content is you biggest problem. I can instantly spot where you got most of it from, it is old, even the newer stuff is 15 – 20 years old, it shows in style, especial when you have such photoset under the tag of Fresh Faces, and it was a model I was shooting 20 years ago.
You are mostly flogging a dead donkey here, sure I have no doubt (myself include) have all looked and purchased content from this source, listed on your signature, but it is only to fill a hole in content scheduling or because of one model, generally the content is accepted but not overly enjoyed, it was just filler.
Keep that in mind when getting creators on board, I have no doubt you or you team have made the case to justify using questionable quality content, conniving yourselves is one thing, convincing people to hand over cash is another, convincing creators to sign up for a platform is yet another.
To sum it up, curiosity draws people in but retaining them will be where you fail. Some off the content, is shot well and is still good in terms of quality, but getting back to the remark above, it was odd even back when it was shot, and that is why their own websites failed.
The site is good, the content needs to move with the times.
|