|
Great breakdown from TheLegacy — the aggregator vs destination distinction is really the core of it, and it lines up with what I’ve seen on the cam side too.
The WLs that actually pick up Google traffic tend to treat the feed as just the base layer, not the site itself. They build around it with indexable structure: niche landers (couples, fetish, latinas, etc.), internal linking, and enough written content for Google to understand intent and context — not just crawl thumbnails.
One thing I’d add is that differentiation isn’t only on-page. The actual stream/source matters more than people think. When everyone is pulling the same polished aggregator feeds, Google only needs a couple of winners. Sites that mix in more “raw” / amateur-style inventory tend to stand out more naturally, which helps bypass part of the duplicate filtering TheLegacy and bns666 mentioned.
At that point, links and authority start to actually work — but only once there’s something unique for them to reinforce.
__________________
Amateur Cash | 20% RS Lifetime | amateur.cash/en | @amateurtvcash
|