Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegacy
The tipping point usually occurs when the site starts looking less like an "aggregator" and more like a "destination."
|
Yeah, I figured G needed to see signals that showed it was a site unto itself. Some aggregators are like that, lots of extra content, bells/whistles etc. But some, like cambb (I think?) seem to be aggregators alone and still rank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegacy
If your neglected sites are doing better, it’s probably because they look more natural to the algorithm; your main sites might be so "perfectly" optimized with curated links that they’ve accidentally created a commercial footprint that feels like a project rather than a genuine user destination.
|
It's funny how some sites that I do nothing with will do well after G updates. Maybe the game is to create 100 aggregators and see which pick up traffic? Kind of a joke.