Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxclusive
She simply is under investigation, nothing more nothing less. There are witnesses and social media chats.
It's in the media as she as pet is worth a headline for clicks. Is it good that it's done before the final trial? Well no, but it's always done like this even with minor celebs, maybe some more victims will pop up.
One day a court will judge her by the collected evidence and declare her guilty or not guilty. That's the process.
|
One day in court. So you're saying or assuming she's guilty and she will be charged or this will go to trial? Most of these things end with a plea deal.
In the US, there are things called due process. The government must follow fair procedures when it acts to deprive a person of a right. For example, a prosecutor presenting deliberately fabricated evidence to obtain a conviction would be a violation of procedural due process.
Furthermore, due process is violated if a prosecutor's statements to the press create prejudicial publicity that prevents the defendant from receiving a fair trial, a situation often referred to as "trial by press" or "trial by public". While prosecutors have a right to inform the public, statements that are inflammatory or prejudicial and make a fair trial unlikely can lead to due process violations.
There has been no mention of a warrant, but yet, LE is claiming she is "at large". Really? There's more, but I won't bother.
Under investigation and having charges filed are two entirely different things. And even if charges are filed, it still doesn't mean someone is guilty, until ALL EVIDENCE has been presented and a verdict is given. The thing is, none of this applies with law enforcement, they can say whatever, whenever the fuck they want and get away with it and media just posts it like its facts. In my opinion, this needs to change.