View Single Post
Old 08-27-2025, 04:40 PM  
asorelli
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggles View Post

All of the lawyers and non-creative dipshits are big mad because they want to put themselves as the gatekeepers of art.

Art doesn't "belong" to anyone. It is a privilege to make art in society, which is why, despite being dirt poor and struggling, I have never turned to crime to support myself and other than speeding occasionally, I generally behave like a gentleman. Being able to produce things that you just made up (or received) is the reward itself. The journey IS the reward, anything more is just gravy on top.

So many artists and scientists died broke because the journey WAS the destination, getting "rich" had nothing to do with it.

Now art today is little more than slop that was built on slop, pushed by psychotic people in charge of spreading their control over the media, ran like a cult, with the same artists appearing over and over and over again and choking out new artists and new vibes.

AI Music is so fresh, is so new, it is a joy to listen to and experience the liberation of creativity, so that now even the grandma down the street who always wanted to make an opera song, she can work at it and tune it to sound like what she's been imagining for 50 years. AI Music has turned me on to some K-pop now, some sick ass AI K-pop tracks for sure.

No question that the output can be crazy good. No question that the possibilities are endless. But, I'm a realist. So, i think the question is not who owns the rights to the music/art, because it is most definitely owned by the Artists / Record Label / Song Writer / Etc. The question is, is a song created by this AI (that was created or inspired by the Original) violating any sort of copyright. If it's deceptively similar and the models used were trained off of or from that music, I'm gonna say yes. But, I think it's open and free game to use right now. I suppose the rest is open for debate.


There are some providers that have not used any other Artists work, but the end product is like listening to porn music from 1970. So, yeah ... not really there yet from my experience at least. That's what I meant by choose your provider wisely. Suno and Udio both have used Artist's songs to train their models, which means you are basically using someone else's talent to create this music. Does that mean that what was created with it it will be at risk at some point? Not sure ... but I'm sure the outcome of this lawsuit will set a precedence. Until then, enjoy the show.
asorelli is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote