Quote:
Originally Posted by asorelli
Even after the CEOs of the two mentioned AI providers (link above) admitted to copying songs to use for their training models. Reasoning was because they were publicly made available.
|
All of the lawyers and non-creative dipshits are big mad because they want to put themselves as the gatekeepers of art.
Art doesn't "belong" to anyone. It is a privilege to make art in society, which is why, despite being dirt poor and struggling, I have never turned to crime to support myself and other than speeding occasionally, I generally behave like a gentleman. Being able to produce things that you just made up (or received) is the reward itself. The journey IS the reward, anything more is just gravy on top.
So many artists and scientists died broke because the journey WAS the destination, getting "rich" had nothing to do with it.
Now art today is little more than slop that was built on slop, pushed by psychotic people in charge of spreading their control over the media, ran like a cult, with the same artists appearing over and over and over again and choking out new artists and new vibes.
AI Music is so fresh, is so new, it is a joy to listen to and experience the liberation of creativity, so that now even the grandma down the street who always wanted to make an opera song, she can work at it and tune it to sound like what she's been imagining for 50 years. AI Music has turned me on to some K-pop now, some sick ass AI K-pop tracks for sure.
