View Single Post
Old 12-13-2024, 09:36 AM  
pornlaw
Confirmed User
 
pornlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseQuinn View Post
for me I spent about 3k to get a bunch more, and got that 3k back as well. glad Ms J was paid, she more than deserved it

lawyer who took me on set me up with one of his newest associates. American but Jamaican by birth. didn't even live here yet, was still in CA at the time. through my husband knew her people. might have been why she worked for me so hard, but honestly she was just young, eager, fighter for her clients

weird confluence of events, just saying in lived experience small claims can work. that was the point I specifically addressed to refute your assertion

not all the DMCA cos are in some far off foreign land. either way, rather than help people in your free time just all 'lawyer up and sue'

you responded stating it's easier to go after creators. no doubt. had addressed why they often don't know

yes 'ignorance of the law no excuse blah blah' but treat peeps like "don't worry yo pretty lil head but I'll see you in court" when simple convos can bring down parasite companies and protect legit industry

you're a hammer. not everything is a nail. often there are easier, cheaper, more effective ways. like talking to peeps and sharing info

on every set, in resources on every fan and clips site, just talk to people and provide info. if receiving an unfair DMCA for legit content, hit up the performer if he/she is still active along with doing the tedious work of a DMCA counter

for the one I referenced, try getting a list of 1000's of URLs as 'proof' of work performed. they hire these co's so they don't have to wade through all that. that's the point and these co's take advantage of it

annoying to act when targeted, but possible to prevent further fuckery absent court

real pirates need to die in a fire, we're not talking about those peeps here


more broadly do a Matyko. good luck man, you're super cool. keep dancing
Congratulations and I agree with you that if you can resolve without resorting to litigation is the best situation for everyone involved.

That rarely happens and it didnt happen in your situation either. You needed to hire and attorney and enter into litigation.

And collecting on a small claims judgment is the exception not the rule. Consider yourself lucky... you're in the 25% of people who did collect.


https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/p...collection.pdf

And I have tried to go down the route of having someone talk to the creator and request that the creator white label my client with their DCMA service or have their DCMA service retract the takedown notice... so far, its been requested about a dozens times. We have done it directly to the creator, through the creator's agent and through the creator's PR company.

To this date it has never worked. My client's request just gets ignored.

So in theory, its a nice idea. But in practicality it hasnt worked for my clients.
__________________
Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
pornlaw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote