View Single Post
Old 02-17-2024, 02:05 PM  
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxuniversity View Post
Not only would it be a good idea to shift towards the use of fingerprints for authentication, but there shouldn't be retention requirements that says a company has to hold onto all of this documentation. Once the documentation is reviewed and processed and the person is authenticated, there should be requirements to destroy the documentation.
OR....just do it the way it was always done in business. I provide a service (traffic), I get paid.

And the company I provided the service to ALREADY has my Federal EIN (tax ID), AND is paying my company to a United States bank that has ALREADY done KYC on me and my company.

There is no need for "authentication".
Just like I don't need to "authenticate" any business that I pay for a service or product.
They are paying ME for the service. It's none of their goddamned business legally.

ONLY banking institutions are required to do this as far as I know.

But I am open to somebody showing me even one Federal regulation that calls for a company to demand another companies corporate papers in order to get paid.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote