Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyM
That doesn't detect the worst STDs: HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis.
Useless.
+ messing with urine samples of actors and testing them on set is not just disgusting, but also time consuming. If they wanna shoot porn, get them to undergo blood tests, there is a shit ton of male actors to choose from if they refuse.  |
Correct and that's what the blood testing is for as I clearly stated, or did you stop reading to throw up after you saw "urine".
If you're grossed out by urine on-set then you're obviously not a producer. I've had to deal with EVERY single body fluid on-set and urine is the least of my worries. It's not like we're dealing with needles and blood.
BTW, testing isn't for prevention, it's for containment. The ONLY prevention would be testing everyone before every shoot which obviously isn't practical.
For example: Someone can get tested on day 1 and on day 2 unknowingly contracts HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis, etc but they are cleared for the next 12 days.
I believe testing on-set right before a shoot will be the future. Testing every 14 days is great but how many people can someone fuck in 14 days? A lot, especially considering how many talent also escort.
This isn't the complete answer to testing but it's one step closer and I believe we'll eventually be at a point where a urine test can detect everything.