Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton
A lot of companies are recently making up new rules that neither have anything to do with 2257 nor what Mastercard is actually asking for. And I don't know why, it's like the owners listen to some overpaid lawyers who have no idea about how this business works.
|
word. joined a site recently, figured another place to sell content I already sell elsewhere and everything was fine except for my ID
I submitted a colour scan of my notarized passport and they were all 'ID rejected'. apparently it has to be a picture of my ID. the image I took of the back of the passport and the pic of me holding it were accepted
the hell? I have never had a notarized scan rejected, including by my merchant bank. plus there's a pic they did accept of me holding it so it's obviously the same fucking ID lol
two other content sites I joined at the same time, one of them US-based, had no problem with the scan. it's notarized by the High Commission of Canada in Jamaica ffs, wouldn't that make it even more legit?
I know baddog has his finger on the pulse of all things cc compliance and 2257 but this is ridiculous
I haven't taken the pic yet. I will, when I get around to it
Quote:
Originally Posted by amacontent
As of now Ive never been asked for back of license
|
in the past me neither. with the three sites I mentioned above they did ask for back of ID. assuming that's a new reg as it seems to be across the board or perhaps just a CYA in a currently hostile climate? I dunno
I log into my c4s every time I upload and I don't see any notification regarding missing documentation, for either myself or an occasional clip partner who's ID is on my account. maybe they're starting with bigger studios first?
sucks for those no longer in contact with co-performers/hired talent, does that render the content unsellable?
what a mess for you. and send via email? how come everyone is so worried about security except for when it comes to peeps in adult?