|
And if so, what's the issue with that?
Do you genuinely believe that paying a one-time lump sum for someone's explicit pictures and videos grants you a lifetime irrevocable license from a moral standpoint?
Should someone challenge this in the court of law, you would lose.
You can't compare pornography to a motion picture or something similar. Porn is porn, and if you believe that it isn't, then let someone take explicit pictures and videos of you in every imaginable pose for $500 - $1000 (or maybe a bit more) and then try not to complain after you realize that the deal is completely one-sided and that you've been had.
Pornography doesn't have to be predatory, but it generally is. That's why a lot of lawmakers want to ban porn, not because they want to infringe on someone's freedom of speech.
|