View Single Post
Old 09-04-2003, 11:07 PM  
EvilDan
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: I like being Down Under
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23


"It is clear that nothing in trademark law requires that title to domain names that incorporate trademarks or portions of trademarks be provided to trademark holders. To hold otherwise would create an immediate and indefinite monopoly to all famous mark holders on the Internet, by which they could lay claim to all .com domain names which are arguably 'the same' as their mark. The Court may not create such property rights-in-gross as a matter of dilution law. ... Trademark law does not support such a monopoly.
-- Strick Corporation v. James B. Strickland, EDPA (27-Aug-01) "

http://www.domainhandbook.com/dd.html
Thank you stocktrader23

Finally some sense in the debate - I appreciate it greatly
EvilDan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote