In 9 years I have seen only 3 actual proof's of shaving complete with screen caps. Only 3 and yeah those were bomb mad page views and the webmasters that proved it ended up out of business or just built there own program for there traffic channels.
When definitive proof comes to light then I think we got something but otherwise... It is truly Rhetoric and posturing.
These days I personnally do not even trust hardly any Traffic Brokers to send traffic correctly and if they so wish they themsleves can shave the traffic and blame it on the sponsor to the purchasing client.
Some brokers are good, some are bad, and just because a broker comes out saying and screaming shave does not mean he is on the 100% up and up. Its dirty hands everywhere trying to grab something pure and when its not achieved a scapegoat will always be made.
This whole thread is really nothing more than the same ol "Sponsors Shave " rhetoric without definitive proof.
Even dropping marbles into a bucket will have various results and someone will always have theories why there were less or more on the various instances.
|