Quote:
Originally posted by Choker
Hince the dilema. What is considered "proof" of sponsor shaving? I am not about to go on record saying I think joeblow is cheating based on these results. It would not stand up in a court, so why slander someone? I'm just saying that my results lead me to conclude that 95% of the big sponsors are shaving one way or another. I suggest that everyone run all their hits thru their own script instead of sending it to the sponsor directly. Trust but verify.
|
I'm not saying you should go to court with the information you posted here, but you could atleast, and anyone else with this experience, tell us what sponsor is not worth promoting because of serious shaving.
Atleast that way we can keep us, adult webmasters, updated about the good and the bad sponsors.
Maybe someone, maybe you choker, can put up a professional website where with some kind of script you can track down if people (maybe people that use your CTTS) give bad comments or good comments on a certain sponsor.
So just a list with all the sponsors out there (with your ref in it so you can even make some bucks) and maybe even a search option so people can search into the sponsor database and look up if there are good or bad comments, and make the best sponsors 'green', the neutral sponsors 'gray' and the bad sponsors 'red'.
You could set something like this up choker, with your CTTS, it might get a very populair place to check out for some good sponsors or see the bad ones.
Just one of my ideas, think about it...