Quote:
Originally posted by Choker
I STRONGLY disagree. First this is a CIVIL matter not a criminal matter so the findings a court could conclude can and often does swing the way you least expect. If I posted that a sponsor was shaving and was unable to produce evidence that a court would consider 100% proof, that sponsor could most definatley use that ruling to sue my ass off for slander.
|
Not if you have a good legal team.
Who said to state a sponsor is shaving?
All you're doing is stating counting results. I imagine you get a lot of webmasters who buy traffic and then bitch that the numbers aren't in perfect sync with what they show as receiving on their sponsor stats. And that was one of the reasons the tests were performed.
So what is there to fear if these tests are as accurate as you say they are?
As I said before. If they are true and honest you are not libeling any company just stating factual test results, that were performed in mass duplication to ensure their integrity.
I don't see what the problem is here.
Why post if you aren't willing to back up your claims in black and white for everyone to see and judge??