Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
They have no clue what goes into producing good content. This is a side of the business that values content on, exclusivity, price, length of video and number of images. Which is why most of it is crap. Only companies like Met Art can call their product high quality because of the thought that goes into producing the content.
Companies like Twistys was a poor second to Penthouse.
|
so if this is all crap and met-art is the thing people will buy, where is the problem?
we are ok with the crap and make millions out of it buy giving it for free.
met-art is still in biz - maybe you should try to offer them your HQ products - if you are right they will buy it.
it is not you, not me and not met-art that make the rules - it is the market.
no one will come up with the idea of met-art forbidding to do what they do.
met-art is aimed at its market and we at ours. it is so simple.
did you check how many news you get for free on the net every day? and did you ever think that you had to pay before the net existed when you bought a newspaper?
probably the most remarkable part of this fact is that many publishers who didn't want to get away from paper and subscriptions are bankrupt today. the others who adapted it and no longer finance themselves through subscriptions but advertising are again making huge profits.