Quote:
Originally Posted by tony286
Youtube showed us, content doesn’t have to be high end to do well. When I took a video class 100 yrs ago. The instructor stated 2 thirds of the video experience is audio, which then opened my eyes why the shitty shot or quality videos do well on YouTube since the audio is digital for the most point it’s on the money. For porn the am content shot shitty by some cam chick and her BF or BFF can be tons hotter than something shot with lots of money and experience because everyone really wants to be there and it’s actually a turn on to the models on some level. The vibe in the air makes a huge difference in my opinion. Models got tired of working for others and having no control. I can see the money not being as quick but they have control and they own the content. I don’t think the industry is shrinking it’s just different.
|
Agreed a real amateur performance can be way more enjoyable than a well lit, well shot faked performance. This is why your instructor was right, the quality of the sound the model is making is essential. Not the quality of the recording. Which is why most porn stars go to work for real and don't fake it. But a badly shot, badly lit performance from a bad model is still shit.
Some models never chose porn as a career whether they control their own content or others do. That's where the experienced porn producer comes into his own.
Why do people still think the style something is shot in defines the quality of the product?