Quote:
Originally Posted by MFCT
Let's say you're a renter, and your landlord takes you to court for not paying rent for the past 6 months. You provide cancelled checks for those 6 months in question, all having been filled out clearly and properly to your landlord, and all paid in full.
The judge states that while there appears to be no evidence that you have not paid rent to your landlord for those 6 months in question, it does not prove that a crime hasn't been committed. Therefore, you're sentenced to eviction, 6 months in jail, a $5000 fine, and ordered to pay 6 months in back rent to your landlord.
If "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the president, it does not apply to any of us. You don't have to support the president, but you should not support this "precedent."
|
Nobody has 'charged' POTUS with anything. They can not.
The President is the only person in America that can not be charged with a crime.
Special counsel can not charge him, but he was a finder of facts that Congress can use in their investigations. He found 'obstruction' on multiple counts.
The Congress is the only body that can take action against him for personal behavior.
They do not have to PROVE anything (a opinion will do) , but to keep public support in their favor, they had better run a chain of evidence that shows that bad behavior. But it is in the report.
They are constitutionally charged and bound to do that.
Anyone not liking the rules, ...change them. but you better be sure of what you are changing. Many implications are not seen.