Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I live in Northern California, just north of Sacramento. I used to live near the "outer San Franscisco Bay Area" (Daville, California), moved to Phoenix to go to work for Lightspeed Cash, and then back to California to work for Playboy. I love where I live. I am a short drive to Reno, Lake Tahoe, and a two hour drive from San Francisco (which is just a beautiful city). I am within driving distance of Vegas and LA - or a short flight. We have all of the perks of California without the crap of SoCal - less traffic, less crime, less smog, and better weather. We have seasons here - It gets cold in the winter by never snows (yet snow is forty-five minutes away if we really MUST see it) and it gets hot in the summer but never nearly as hot as Phoenix. Oh, and no earthquakes here either.
|
You've been misled, Lincoln is one of the most dangerous areas to live in the country. Not only does it lie directly on a major flood plain, but its also right near the areas of greatest concern for fast-spreading wildfires. Lol at no earthquakes, you sit right near the Cleveland Hills and Sierra Nevada fault lines and smack dab in the San Joaquin fault zone. You have a 76% likelihood of a 7.0+ striking near you in the next 30 years.
https://www.earthquakeauthority.com/...ults-By-County
When you account for all of the imminent dangers posed to Lincoln, CA because of its location, you have a 60% chance of your house being devastated in the next 15 years. You've chosen to live there and accept the risks that accompany that decision, so it will be hard to feel sorry for you, not if, but when something happens. Please don't sugarcoat where you live without at least being truthful about the downsides.