Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Would you say the same thing if Hillary was elected, fired Comey because he was investigating her "emails".. then fired the AG because of the "email thing".. then fired the acting AG because he wouldn't end the investigation then finally put a puppet AG in place who finds she didnt do anything wrong..
I suspect your idea of what is ok and isnt would be 100% opposite of what it is now..
|
I have no dog in the fight, so no I would not have any issues. Firing Comey imo was justified by either Hillary or Trump, the guy was an idiot, he may have cost Hillary the election with his last minute email nonsense. Firing his AG who recused himself to me means nothing, I don't think Sessions had any skin in the game for the investigation so moot point. The last point about firing the acting AG because he wouldn't end the investigation is news to me, but ill be honest I stopped watching CNN and any other news because it was mentally gymnastics to even try to keep up with what was real or fake IMO.
The question I asked remains un-answered, can you obstruct if there was no crime?