mopek1

The agent looked into the transactions between us. Saw everything. Then said that my refund is coming via E-CHECK. He said that in EVERY SINGLE CASE (like ours anyway), the reason for an E-CHECK is because there is not enough in the user's Paypal balance. He said that my refund would have been instant if the amount I sent was still there. So it's a matter of logic rather than disclosure.

So while he never told me exactly what Statiztics balance was, which I agree would be a violation, he told me that by looking into our accounts, by looking at the transactions, that if Statiztics had enough to cover my refund it would be instant. This is not a violation of trust as knowing that my refund is going to take 3-8 days, and knowing the refund is coming via E-CHECK, makes the information OBVIOUS to all parties that whatever I sent to him is no longer there, and that there is not enough balance in his account. This is simple logic and not disclosure of another account user's info.

Hope that clears that up.