Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire
Wait a second. The gunman is white Australian a guest of the ethic Māori people, brown people of New Zealand.
"ethnic nationalist" is white nationalist you're not fooling anyone.
The second page of his manifesto specifically talks about removing all non-european people and then he bitches and moans about the white birth rate and how it's declining.
So you think the terrorist coward murderer is fine with other brown people in their own brown country when he (an Australian) is in a foreign country of brown Māori people (New Zealand) and goes to kill innocent unarmed brown people at two churches there? I don't believe you are that naive.
A white right wing nut job with a 73 page manifesto titled "The Great Replacement" goes to a foreign country of brown people and kills brown people on their soil.
|
There is absolutely a difference between white nationalist and ethnic nationalist. That being said, I agree with you on one thing - I find it extremely ironic that he would do this on what is effectively "stolen lands" like Australia/New Zealand. Would have made more sense if he did this somewhere in Europe. The "right of conquest" idea seems pretty weak in terms of Australia or NZ.