Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
There is a huge difference between the two.
The Republican party went after Hillary for no reason. There was no crime; There was no accusation of crime. With the first issue they were "looking into the mishandling" of confidential information. No crime committed, no crime named, but multiple investigations.
|
Rochard, sorry but you're mistaken. She should've been charged with mishandling classified material, a violation of the Espionage Act. She also lied to Congress repeatedly. That was confirmed by James Comey. Also deleting the emails was another crime.
FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Same thing with Benghazi. The event had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton, but they had multiple investigations to "look into things". To this very day some people blame American deaths in Benghazi on Hillary Clinton, even though she had nothing to do anything that happened in Benghazi.
|
Rochard, sorry but you're mistaken. She intentionally delayed the rescue team that was en route to help. They could've saved American lives but were prevented. The Stated Dept ordered them to change clothes 4 times.
Benghazi Probe Finds Marines' Response Was Slowed by Uniform Changes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
With Trump we are having a legitimate investigation. This will take down the President, dozens with him, and investigations will continue for long after Trump leaves office.
|
Rochard, sorry but you're mistaken. There's been no evidence of any wrongdoing. Without an initial crime there's simply no valid reason to start any investigation.
I would suggest getting better news sources
