Quote:
Originally Posted by MFCT
I believe the 2nd more elaborate experiment was designed to see if a machine's observation affected the outcome of the double-slit experiment, as opposed to a human's observation. It didn't. A human with consciousness needs to be observing the outcome in order to affect it.
This proved that mere mindless machine observation doesn't collapse the wave. Something with consciousness (a human) is necessary for that. This indicates that consciousness is entangled with matter.
Matter existed before humans. It existed since its creation during the Big Bang. If consciousness is entangled with matter, then all matter must have been created that way. This suggests that something with consciousness must have been watching the Big Bang as it occurred. How can this be, when absolutely nothing could possibly exist (certainly no humans) before or at the time of the Big Bang?
If THAT consciousness was entangled with all matter upon its creation, and if OUR consciousness is also entangled with all matter...then OUR consciousness must be entangled with THAT original consciousness.
You need proof that God exists? There's your proof.
|
Good point. God can be perceived in a lot of different ways, from mainstream religion, spiritualism or just nature. But something had to get this party started.
I'm not entirely sold on the big bang. We could be the result of a blackhole opening a new universe, I guess that would be a big bang. But I don't think there's an end to the universe, because that just wouldn't make sense.
I don't believe 'nothing' can exist. Like, how could 'nothing' exist? It's fun to think about, but it's a rabbit hole with no end.