Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
true but LESS books what was the original business model
|
Which is precisely what I'm saying. Less porn is sold today because of the vast numbers consuming it for free. see that you can not follow me?
Quote:
see that you can not follow me?
if that is the case much more cars would be sold because they can be financed by ads.
do you know HOW MANY professional car drivers wouldn´t be able to buy a car?
what about all the taxi drivers - don´t they do it?
what about formula 1 ?
|
Now you've stopped being sensible and resorted to being silly.
The proof that less porn is sold today is right before you. If porn or/and ad sales in 2018 were as high as 2006 there would be more porn producers. And all would be working with the budgets of 2006. The truth is the opposite. Porn production has dropped dramatically, the number of models has dropped dramatically, the prices paid have dropped dramatically both to models and producers.
Even if one company owned everything they would still need to produce a good product across all their niches, styles and genres.
But, this is where you're being silly, the cost of 2006 is too high for the return of 2018. Like the cost of giving away free cars to sell advertising.
Tubes can only survive with free content.