Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
have you been on this alliance with your collection guns?
did all the snipers of the past decades do ?
this argument is poor as we are not talking about unarming an army.
if you would really READ the second amendment carefully you would also know that this right to civil person is NOT given there.
a cilvil person can not be called " axwel regulated" militia. thatwould be called anarchy.
because collective orders or decisions that exist in the case of a militia do not exist.
at the time at which sīder 2. constitutional amendment was written there was also no such militia.
at the latest with the introduction of the homeland security there is this "well regulated militia" on which the 2, constitutional amendment aims.
|
You should research District of Columbia v. Heller, and Caetano v. Massachusetts.
Maybe you'll find a clue and stop making yourself look like a retard.
You'd probably be better off not trying to tell us what our Constitution says and stop trying to interpret it, because you're not very good at it.