10-15-2018, 10:53 AM
|
|
|
l8r
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,514
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
The only FACT is that she lied about her heritage in order to get ahead.
|
Prove it.
You will not be able to. I used politifact because it was available. The only ones saying she used it to get ahead are her opponents.
You state something is a fact but don't back it up with anything. I at least take the time to back up my claims.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/12/el...s-controversy/
Quote:
“I never used it to get ahead,” she said in the Nov. 27 interview with Cooper. “I never used it to get into school. I never used it to get a job.”
We are not aware of anyone having proved anything different.
|
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...r-what/257415/
Quote:
|
The best argument she's got in her defense is that, based on the public evidence so far, she doesn't appear to have used her claim of Native American ancestry to gain access to anything much more significant than a cookbook;
|
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nat...O0K/story.html
Quote:
|
In the most exhaustive review undertaken of Elizabeth Warren’s professional history, the Globe found clear evidence, in documents and interviews, that her claim to Native American ethnicity was never considered by the Harvard Law faculty, which voted resoundingly to hire her, or by those who hired her to four prior positions at other law schools. At every step of her remarkable rise in the legal profession, the people responsible for hiring her saw her as a white woman.
|
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/har...ss-report-says
Quote:
Although critics have charged that Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has advanced her career with a narrative that she is a distant descendant of Cherokee and Delaware tribes, Harvard University never considered her ethnicity when it hired her as a law professor, according to a report Saturday.
The Boston Globe reported interviews and documents showed that the issue was not considered by Harvard Law faculty when it considered her application in the 1990s.
The report also saw no consideration of her race when she applied to work at Rutgers, the University of Houston, the University of Texas or the University of Pennsylvania.
|
. |
|
|