Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
you live in a van and can't get a job in the most robust economy in decades and give the benefit of the doubt to a potential rapist for an SCJ spot.
it's clear who the fool is.
|
Sometimes I see you be very reasonable.
Other times not so much. The woman has lied about several things, fear of flying for one. The second "rape door" in her home was actually to serve another business who rented a room in the house.. Do you honestly believe she wasn't coached as hell with that testimony of hers?
Did you not detect a smug "fuck you I'm throwing a wrench in it" tone when she was being questioned?
What about common sense about the timing of all this..? Not suspect to you at all?
Here is a fact... From here on out, anyone can make accusations without proof (even if they are thirty year old accusations) and levy them at anyone they choose, and suffer no consequences.
The woman is a nutter, just like her students said she was. She did her best to make herself not look like a nutter, but that is the appearance and voice of someone who is barely hanging on to reality in my humble opinion.
Bottom line,
Dems already got caught boycotting the candidate before they were even named.. Remember the "XX" form?
To think or even consider for w moment that this wasn't some dirty contrived last minute character assassination trick is simply naive.