Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen
I remember these threads from you.. and you never seem to understand the difference between theoreticals and a proof. If someone rights a paper trying to prove this or that without hard evidence and uses hypotheticals and assumptions? It remains theoretical.
I appreciate the effort but it's a major mis representation of fermi or drake.
|
you seem to not get I'm having fun with these threads. I like challenging people's assuming it's a fact we are not alone. YOU don't realize YOU don't have a proof of that.
and btw lighten up, if not, don't try to be a party pooper.
of course the fucking theory isn't proven. fucking duh.