View Single Post
Old 06-04-2018, 01:30 PM  
xClips Jim
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
"The ruling concluded that the commission violated Phillips' religious rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment."

They were just playing it safe by narrowing the scope. The decision fits the broader scope they just don't want to address it. Even whacked out liberals know deep down it's true.. Wasn't there a thing about some "nazi's" or whatever being kicked out of a coffee shop recently? Imagine if they made the decision those nazi's could stay and that liberal coffee shop couldn't say shit about it?

But I agree, dumb case because of liberal whining.
Well, I can't speak for what SC Justices' intend or want to address - but in this case, they did not decide all baker's get to choose whether or not to make gay wedding cakes.

While I don't think anyone should be forced to make cakes, it's a damn slippery slope.
xClips Jim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote