Quote:
Originally Posted by xClips Jim
It's really not a matter of argument - more about bringing this issue into the open. A huge majority of speech currently takes place on a few platforms. What, if any, rights do people have to ensure their voices are not censored on these platforms based on the views of the people that own or run them?
People like Mrs. Bladewire laugh at what they think is a defeat for the President. They don't understand what is happening in the background and how he keeps using these things to bring attention to them. Hook, line and sinker - over and over again.
|
I'm referring to the legal arguments of the case, not GFY arguments.
I don't know the answer to your question, I'm looking to the courts for clarification on that, I think this judge did bring the issue into the open, but a higher court needs to sort it out clearly.