Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
You didn't read the article I take it? The reason he is asking for it is because of that precise problem. They are bringing the charges to court in one investigation but the charges derived from another investigation. This is the whole scheme.. They extended the prior investigation including the FISA warrants into Mueller's "probe." It's just a continuation of the earlier.. That's it.. If they wouldn't have done that Mueller's team would have had to go back to a judge and explain why they needed to have surveillance on the President and his people. How well do you think that would have worked? The judge would have said "You're just trying to target Trump"
|
no, of course I read the article. I'm not going to waste time making uninformed posts and I actually prefer making informed posts.
it's common for charges unrelated to stem from an investigation. No one wants our law enforcement to turn a blind eye to crimes simply because they discovered them investigating another crime. You read that into the article. The article also states this judge is very aware of the flight risk and issues manafort presents to the court, thus his view on Manafort's bond, cited in the article I read that you posted and an important part of how he views this.