Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Just a quick question.
Say, hypothetically, you were put in charge of investigating the President of the United States on charges that he might have colluded with a foreign government to help him get elected. These are very serious charges and the POTUS, for his part, is actively and aggressively attacking you and anyone who suggests he may have done something wrong. He is going after the intelligence community, the justice department, both parties and even members of his own staff. He tweets daily about how this is all a witch hunt and he is innocent. He is trying everything he can to discredit you and your investigation.
Now, with this in mind, what percentage of any evidence you may gather against him do you make public?
|
"Collusion" isn't a crime buddy. And no, he didn't do it, or need any help from a foreign country. Nothing that Russia might've done affected the outcome of the election. That's established fact. What, you think some Facebook ads swayed the election? Gimme a break- more than half were placed after the election and most were for pro-Hillary causes.
Anyone who believes the Russia hoax is a gullible dupe.
