Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Which sounds great when you put it like that. The problem with your theory is it puts people on welfare. So add 17.50 per hour to the amount a person gets on welfare. Then your scheme goes belly up.
The reason I moved to Czech was the abundance of talent. gfy.com/fucking-around-and-program-discussion/1282763-paul-markhams-babes-average-girls-readers-wives-pictures.html this shows how many more girls we had to shoot. Between 1988 and 1999 I shot roughly 400 sets. Between 2000 and 2008 we shot 2,000 sets, some of a much higher quality.
Let me put that in terms you understand. Do you work on dial-up or broadband? Can you see your mistake?
|
I dont have a scheme Paul.
My post is not a "plan".
I am pointing out the facts. The consumer drives what is and is not made. The consumer decides what products sell.
If a competing business produces a cheaper product of equal quality they will sell more than you do.
Those are the undeniable rules of economics.
You went to Cz because there are lots of girls who will drop their knickers at a price that was attractive to you.
There are the same girls in the UK, but not at the same price.
You can spin it anyway you want, but you are an economic migrant pontificating on how terrible it is that there are economic migrants.
Fucking hypocrite with zero understanding of basic economics, despite the fact that your own life is an abject lesson in how economics drives the movement of goods, services, and ultimately people.
