Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
the right of conquest was written by conquerors...how convenient eh?
look 95% of the wealth in SA is controlled by whites...now you have 2 possible options:
1) status quo...the 90% of the population can str8 go fuck themselves...
2) a fairer system should be put in place...
europe can not be compared to africa because land ownership is more evenly distributed...jobs and industry are more developed...a person in europe can find a job and not rely on farm land...in africa this is not so...
africa was raped dry but white people...white culture grew, white science grew, white trade grew, white markets grew and white people accumulated wealth and industry at the great expense of the exploited...europe is a different world thanks to this...
there is no magic solution but the situation in south africa is a joke...something has to be done or it will only get worse...the majority of any country has the right to its own resources...
|
Why can Africa not be compared to Europe? It's exactly the same thing. If you decide who lands belong to based on who original owned them then where do you stop? If you go down that rabbit hole then you'd have to go through thousands and thousands of years of land claims. You are saying to give it "back to the people" but there are dozens of "peoples" in south africa. There's 10 other official languages besides english - that's alot of ethnicities and descendants of alot of tribes. It's not exactly "unified" as you have with countries in Europe.