View Single Post
Old 02-26-2018, 02:32 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
well than letīs stick on that:

if the pornsites can pay that money what we want for an adclick they are welcome to buy it.
i would appreciate it - but unfortunately only a few cam sites are able to spend over 200 for a new buyer and even they have a problem to compete with people who spend 500.

porn will work with small affiliates and will not go - but it will never be "the biz" again because the "key: naked pussy" opens also bigger doors.

this is the natural way things are going.
cinema was replaced by TV and still a few cinemas are working but they do a fraction of what TV is doing.

you can not change that by ignoring it.
this is why you can only talk from the past - but the past helps nobody here - i am talking from the presence and the future.because members here on gfy want to make money NOW and not in the past.
What do you base your statements on that giving porn away is making more money than selling porn was in 2007 for the porn industry.?

Do you sell traffic for $30 for 500?
Can you afford to buy traffic from affiliates at the price porn sites did?
Can you afford to buy content at the price porn sites paid?
Could you pay for B/W if it rose to $5 a gig?
Could you afford to have exclusive models?

Porn sites can do all that and more.

Why if the ads game is so great, do you sell scam sites?

You are dead right. Today very few legit porn sites can afford to buy traffic even at $5 per 1,000. As it takes so many 1,000s to convert. They used to pay $30 for a few hundred clicks.

Stick to what can be advertised on porn sites.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote