Quote:
Originally Posted by MsCheyenne
Actually, the book is brutally absurd. Doesn't matter if you like Trump or not, the book is a joke. Everyone wants to jump on the hate Trump hysteria that they don't seem to care if it is a reliable source or, not.
|
how can you use the words "reliable source" to defend someone like trump?
this guy denies any kind of source when it comes to facing facts and he is believing in any conspiracy theory as long as it helps him.
Quote:
|
This guy was sneaking around the White House, jotting down gossip. No one knew he was writing a book or, gave him an interview. He has openly said that he doesn't know if his sources here reliable and, they often contradicted each other.
|
and to say "i am not sure" at different points is bad journalism ???
i think this is EXACTLY the journalism we need !!!
Quote:
|
If he had tracked down the contractors who were caused great financial harm when Trump's company filed bankruptcy, leaving them unpaid, that would be a credible read. But this, National Enquirer hogwash? "Oh, my gawd, his daughter hates the way he styles his hair. He watches National Geographic gorilla movies and, talks to the tv!" This, is what is getting people going? Gesh, what has become of the people in this country.
|
well in the same country people measuring the quality of a presidentīs ideas on the color of his skin.
so why should it not be important what his own daughter thinks about him?
it is just a fact and if you have to think that she is right or wrong is nowhere stated.
Quote:
|
Here is a link to an AOL article, in which, the author is quoted as pretty much saying, the book cannot be verified as being factual. Skip past the videos in which, MSNBC anchors laugh and, smirk while lowering themselves to childish levels. Read the words in the article. The author, himself, says that nothing can be verified as fact and, his sources were not reliable. Gesh.
|
is this not a normal fact? go out and try to research about whatever and you will find many different meanings. but this is what information is made from - many little views and facts maybe completely opposite.
freedom means that ALL of them can be showed and mentioned and not only the facts trump likes to show.
that the majority of statements he received were negative is not the authorīs fault.
letīs have a look on trumpīs unreleased tax cutts. if it goes the trump way they would not even be mentioned anywhere and IF so just in that form that he have nothing to hide.
is that freedom for you ?
than you misunderstood something.
what this guy did was just a collection of statements from people who did not even know that they were interviewed - what might be good because if they would know it i am pretty sure that each of them would have a pre written answer list in his hands and tell the bullshit trump wants them to tell.
the stable genius is sinking in his own shit every day a bit more and nobody in this world can say later "i did not know it". remember that when you start to pay for all the mistakes he have done already.