Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
Where did Binney get the data from that the transfer happened as fast as he says?
Nowhere have I found a reference other than that's "what he heard".
A whole lot of Trump supporters base their analysis on "what they heard" ther same way Trump himself based most of his arguments during the campaign on "What he heard".
So according to you and the other conservafucks, rumors are more accurate than facts.
.
|
Where have the democrats provided ANY evidence of any kind of hack, much less 'the Russians?'
This article is rather long, but it lays out the details:
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
"... the first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. "
~ So it was a transfer directly from the server. And who had access and was disgruntled at the theft of the primary from Bernie? Hmm who could it be..?
"But the Russians!" scream the dems, with no evidence provided, denying FBI examination.
Come on man, use some logic
