Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda
I disagree 100% with this statement:
that means that attributes cannot be named good or bad - they are part of any existence
what you are overlooking is that reality is highly subjective. YOU judge Newtonian physics to be the rule of law in the universe. it is being proven that this is NOT the case almost daily. hence your subjective reality limits your perceptions.
|
i do not overlook that - my planet have 2 poles and not only one.
if a lion kills a dear it might be good for the tiger but not for the dear but if the lion feels sorry for the dear he will die.
one life for another one. if that ois good or bad is a question of the perspetive and NOTHING else i have stated.
Quote:
|
you seem to be stating that the philosophical and physical have a relationship but that the philosophical is limited by the physical world limitations and stipulations of Newtonian physics. I disagree.
|
if philosophy have an end for YOU you are weak in phantasy.
If you get killed by a falling flowerpott you get killed from newton´s laws.
Quote:
|
AND I'm stating that I agree with you on this conditionally, 'attributes cannot be named good or bad', however, I think you are stating the premise wrong. it should be ''attributes are good or bad as I name them.' the oldest reference I'm aware of for this is 'in the begging there was the word' see?
|
nope atrributes are good or bed depending what consequences they have for you.
and I doubt that anyone on this planed can see the WHOLE range of follow ups.
so what i say is that EVERYTHING what happen to you will have either good AND bad consequences. means: in sum they mean nothing because you can just see the shortterm effect.
i think that we both might mean the same thing but my view is a more optimistic one as yours.