View Single Post
Old 12-09-2017, 01:24 AM  
Google Expert
Webmaster
 
Google Expert's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
There was not a firearm, but the police officer did not know that. In fact, the police officer was responding to a report of a firearm so it is understandable that a police officer feared a weapon was present, and it's understandable that the officer thought he would be reaching for a firearm.

Police officers are paid to be in harms way, but they also have the right to protect themselves.

I believe the proper thing for the officers involved to do would be to use non lethal weapons, such as a shot gun that shoots bean bags. This would have protected the officer, and also the victim.
Again, Rochard the armchair commando defending the psycho asshole.

How the fuck are you supposed to CRAWL with your legs crossed, hands up in the air, and forbidden to talk? Let me point an AR-15 at you while you're drunk, scream "I'M GOING TO SHOOT YOU IF YOU DO NOT DO EXACTLY AS I SAY," give you a bunch of conflicting commands, and shoot you after you inevitably fuck up.

If you have even an inkling of sense in your tiny retard brain you'd realize how obvious this COLD BLOODED MURDER really is, and the officer should be severely punished for tarnishing police's reputation by his arrogant bitch behavior.
Google Expert is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote