Originally Posted by nico-t

This is one of your favourite comparisons, but it is completely illogical reasoning.

So according to you, furniture has a higher probability in killing you than terrorists. I assume this is true. But does that mean you have to accept terrorists in your country? What are you trying to say with this completely meaningless comparison? Does that mean we in the western world aren't allowed to criticize our immigration policies (or lack thereof) because it brings in animals?
"Oh don't whine about those people slaughtered in Bataclan. You still have a higher chance your furniture will kill you." You see how retarded that sounds?

Why don't you go to Syria and tell them "Oh don't worry ISIS and others have wiped out so many of your people. You still have a higher chance to be killed by cancer."
This is exactly the same reasoning. Go on, tell these people who have suffered from ISIS the most that cancer or heart failure is still a bigger killer, so that they don't have to do anything against the ISIS threat and to stop whining about it. I'm sure they'll understand your great logic.