Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I think you are wrong. We have very little information about what they've found, but it seems there is already enough evidence to start prosecuting people.
Just as an example, it seems a NY case was re-opened after it was discovered Jared and Ivanka intentionally schemed to fraud people, they knew it, and intentionally planned to do it. The case was dropped for lack of evidence, but now after reading their emails it's plainly obvious they planned to fraud people.
That's just in the past few days.
|
Rochard this is coming directly from the leaders of the Senate intelligence committee.
Quote:
|
"The committee continues to look at all evidence to see if there was any hint of collusion," Burr said, adding that "I am not going to even discuss initial findings, because we haven't any."
|
read it here
He said it himself, after 9 months of investigation, over a hundred people interviewed and over 100,000 documents, they have not a single shred of evidence that suggests collusion. Nothing. Not a damn thing. At what point do you say maybe there's nothing there? I'm sure Russia meddled in our election but I'm doubtful Trump had anything to do with it.