Quote:
Originally Posted by freecartoonporn
is this new thing in 2017, shoot voyeur videos without consent and make profit. ?
|
What's the justification for this????? - ** Adapt or Die ** -
Or is this an incident where the comment about "** Don't know how the Internet works **" should apply because idiots claim that you can film whatever you want in a public place and post it online without anyone's knowledge or consent
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyM
You don't need model release to claim autorship, nor you need model release to prove it.
You become author the moment you created something and should mark you work.
If he watermaked his video, the watermark is an identification of the author, so he is the author unless someone elses PROVES otherwise. So.. if someone published a video with watermarks cropped off, it is his DUTY to prove his authorship as he edited the originally marked work.
|
Copyright is enjoyed (legally in effect) the moment any work is created and it applies to ALL parties that were part of its creation. A release is required for the talent (performers) to quit any claim they may have to the copyright.
Or at least that's the legalities of how it's supposed to work
But in practice anyone that has a copy of the releases can claim that they're the owner of the copyrighted material. If you give someone a copy of your model release you're effectively giving them permission to do whatever they want with your product.
This is why
YOU SHOULD NEVER GIVE ANYONE A COPY OF YOUR MODEL RELEASES unless they actually paid you for them.
Xhamster is just another bunch of crooked piss ass cunts hiding behind DMCA only they're taking it one step further by asking people to provide them with model releases.
Quite frankly someone should create a Tubesite-Leaks site where the names, phone numbers and physical addresses of tube site owners can be posted. This bullshit will never end until someone goes old school on their faggot fanboy asses.