And Baddog is what he is -- a miserable old man.
I could give 2 fucks of what Baddog thinks of me -- you are irrelevant to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The monkey used a tool (a camera) and mimicked the human behavior observed apparently. That shows the intellect of a human toddler perhaps. The monkey gets 25% of the image revenue -- the monkey played an active role in the photography (<producing a selfie>)
Quote:
|
Slater said he made the camera accessible to the macaques, hoping they would play with it and take photos, and argued that ownership rights belonged to his company, Wildlife Personalities Ltd., which had published the photo in a book.
|
-- that was the settlement -- the monkey's recipient being some foundation for the benefit of monkeys.
So, argue why the performer should not receive royalty revenue if he didn't sell his copyright. PETA found a new revenue stream maybe.
The money took the picture of himself -- the man didn't take the picture of the monkey < that was the point of the lawsuit.
MLM: Monkey Lives DO Matter :P