Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Tasty1
If they will buy it elsewhere, but it is not bought from the USA, than that means there is less co2 production in the USA (if farmers have to stop their business), therefor the USA will have less CO2 consumption. That Japan might buy in another part of the world doesn't matter, the USA wil get their goals, what that other country does is up to the Paris agreement. Stop making excuses like; if i don't sell cocaïne, somebody else will sell it anyway.
|
So let me get this right - consumption of beef remains the same (and its unwanted side effects) but it is still a good thing ?
Now it might have slipped past you but The Orange One has removed the US from the Paris agreements whereby they had CO2 goals to meet. Spinning this as good for the US in its quest for a clean environment is not only thoroughly ridiculous, but it ranks as the second stupidist remark on the board today. Well done, a 1-2.
So to re-cap, US farmers lose a valuable export market, CO2 production remains the same, and beef farmers outside of the US are very pleased indeed. Is that what he meant about putting Merica first ?
Please do enlighten us on how cocaine has any relevance whatsoever to the farmers in the US whose businesses are now in jeapody because of your glorious leaders ignorance of how international trade actually works ?
