Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
Paul I am in favor of parents being responsible for their children's actions. If parents are ignorant or unable to seek help setting up filters -- that is not my problem and that is not the government's duty to impose that responsibility on me.
Children are chattel of their parents until they are 18 here. The state has the legal right to enforce parental responsibility.
No, I am not your children's keeper -- you are -- man up to your responsibilities or STFU.
If the state entity wants to pay (with their citizens tax moneys) to create a database and issue a passcode -- I will filter them; if, and only if, they pay to establish database to query, provide me with a OAuth and an API also providing me the code snippet to query and JSON reply authorizing access. The onus is on the UK government -- those are my terms. Comply or fuck you.
|
Does that apply to offline transactions of porn? Your point has no validity, the State is ultimately responsible for who buys what. Can a 14-year-old boy a gun, alcohol, cigarettes, drive a car, etc. No, the State doesn't allow it, you only get your knickers in a twist claiming Freedom of Speech violations over their ability to look at porn.
The onus is on you, comply or they will block you. Will they put pressure on Visa to withdraw processing rights? It will be an interesting case if Visa fights against the UK Government for porn. Let me think about that for a while. Done thinking, you're fucked.
So it is complying or they will fuck you.
