Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
http://cornelllawreview.org/files/20...o99CLR1303.pdf
The UK has no standing, on any US person, on this law in the US Court system.
Not legal advice. But if you are really interested search the word 'international' in the above PDF.
Her Majesty's government may only strong-arm UK persons and legal entities.
|
You are completely missing the point.
Stop and think.
The UK does not need jurisdiction over non UK persons and entities. It does not need to strong arm anyone.
It already has jurisdiction over UK ISPs.
That is all it needs to ensure that you either a) comply and you AV your visitors, or b) you reject UK IP addresses, or c) your site is not visible to 99% of UK surfers because it is blocked and Visa/MC have have pulled your billing.
Now you can be an arse and pick b or c, but why would you ?
Why would you turn away a very affluent market just because you are getting your knickers in a twist about jurisdiction ?
And why would you want to waste resources on peeps that either are unable to pay, or are not confident enough to get their credit card out on your site.
Fighting this is really not the smart move. Costly and ultimately futile.
