Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Yes, let's have an investigation into the leaks because, you know, that's what is important. The possibility of the top adviser to the President Of The United States working with a foreign government isn't important at all. WTF Robbie? You fully support Wikileaks but OMG a leak in the White House and we you are upset.
This isn't even a leak. The FBI is conducting an investigation. Jared is part of that investigation. It's not classified information. I would imagine it is pretty much common knowledge to anyone who works in the White House. In fact, anyone could have guessed this. No one is even surprised.
And yes, it was the Washington Post. It's not the first time the Washington Post has taken down a President because of "leaks".
|
I wasn't even talking about the coming prosecution of the leakers when/if they get caught.
In one post you called Assange a bad guy for "leaking" classified info that hurt Hillary.
And now you praise leakers who hurt Trump.
Which is it?
Anyway, news reporting isn't supposed to be "guessing" or using unnamed sources that have been dead wrong over and over (with no retractions from the Washington Post by the way).
It's supposed to be a reporter finding out the FACTS and verifying them. And then an editor going over the reporters findings and doing a second verification that they are 100% correct.
That obviously has not been the case with the media in their anti-Trump hysteria.
That was what I meant by my post. Hell...a lot of the recent "leaks" haven't been illegal at all. They turned out to just be made-up stories. So the "unnamed source" didn't break any laws on those. lol