Quote:
Originally Posted by robwod
What does it matter if it's 1: 267 or 1:10,000....
Big deal. Affiliates don't care if you tell them your site has a 1:200 ratio. The only thing affiliates are concerned about, or should be concerned about, is who pays them the most for their traffic.
They certainly didn't "screw your sales to traffic ratio" as your ridiculous thread title suggests. Honestly, I wouldn't blame them if they told you to get lost for making such a nonsensical thread.
|
First, i´m not moaning about Freeones... I get on very well with freeones representatives.
I´m merely asking if it is worth having higher sales to traffic ratio than having a few extra sales a month from a huge amount of traffic that is raising my sales to traffic ratio.
You do say that it´s important to have a high paying program, which mine is & with sales ratio of 1:200 as a usual, this also giving a high ratio for affiliates to be paid.
So you´re saying that this could change how many affiliates begin working with my site, if it was to go up any further?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
When a sponsor shares ratios, I assume they are fake, though of course there are honest ones like GSpot
When an affiliate shares ratios, if they are bad I listen, if they are good I am confused why they are sharing and encouraging competition
|
WHP, one thing Gary & I are is fake, no, nothing I´ve said is fake & at no point have I said anything negative about freeones, I love all the people I speak to from freeones & I appreciate the traffic & sales.
I do however want to know if you as an affiliate or anyone as a site or program owner would feel a higher sale to traffic ratio work or is it a negative factor for a few sales.
Let´s be honest 2000:1 from a site like freeone´s is fantastic still & so I´m pleased with my site & content, however i´m still asking the same question...
is it better to have those galleries shown to raise traffic or would most site owners prefer to have the better stats?