Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire
"Q: Do you have evidence of collusion between Trump campaign & Russians?
Yates: I can’t answer that without revealing classified information"
Did you read the article to the end?
The investigation is classified.
They cannot answer direct questions about the investigation.
The way the senators asked certain questions regarding collusion, that were answered a certain way, showed there was evidence of collusion, twice.
This explains it better.
Regardless, it will likely take a while for things to come to the surface. We all know Trump is a conman, 40+ years of thousands of lost and settled cases prove that. He just paid out $25,000,000 in a federal consumer fraud case for fucks sake  |
Yates also explained that because of her answer that it was not to be construed to be a yes. She did that on more than one occasion. She of course could answer the question in a closed hearing as could Clapper when he answered in the same fashion.
Thus far there is zero evidence that, the public knows of, that there was collusion or anyone in a position to know has stated that there was collusion. The investigation is still ongoing and may remain so for years and such investigations often conclude without any specific resolution of a "Yea or Nay".
BTW, I do not need to read an article, I rely upon on my own lying eyes and ears, as I watched the hearing from the beginning to the end.